Language testing and methods of assessment

Communicative testing in language learning

Methods of Assessment


22. What are the problems of assessing communication in a L2?

It is neither possible nor desirable to separate speaking skills from listening skills in many tests of oral production. They are interdependent skills.

This increases the difficulty of analysing precisely what is being tested at any one time. Without a tape recording for subsequent checking, spoken language is transient. The examiner has to make subjective judgements rapidly and often under considerable pressure.

Limited time: it is often impossible to administer this kind of oral test to large numbers of students.

The nature of language: language is interaction-based. Even activities such as letter-writing are affected by interactional factors in real situations.

Unpredictability: processing unpredictable data in real time is a vital aspect of language use. Communication is also affected by the context of the situation, including the physical environment, the roles and status of the participants, and the degree of formality.

Purpose: every utterance is made for a purpose. Communicative performance involves successive approximation towards a successful outcome.

Authenticity: a candidate's communicative ability includes the ability to come to terms with the unknown, including unsimplified authentic language. Artificially simplified or "watered-down" test items may fail to measure genuine communicative ability.

Behaviour-based assessment: communicative ability is concerned with behavioural outcomes and with the primacy of content over form in language use. A test of communicative ability therefore needs to be criterion-referenced against the operational performance of a set of authentic language tasks.

Performance tests: these may involve a global task together with the enabling skills needed to complete it. However, a candidate may be able to demonstrate all the enabling skills separately but still be unable to mobilise them effectively in an actual situation. Driving a car provides an obvious analogy: knowing how to perform each individual operation does not necessarily mean being able to drive successfully. This illustrates the need for performance tests.

Summary of Problems and Book Recommendations

  1. Which performance operations should be tested? What level of proficiency is anticipated? Which enabling skills are involved? Should these skills be tested individually or together? How should the content and format of the test be specified?
  2. How can we avoid hopelessly subjective measures of production while also setting receptive tasks appropriate to different levels of language proficiency?

Note: B. J. Carroll's 1977 specification included:

Recommended Reading

Problem Areas and Possible Solutions